Re: Re: Re: Euphonium cutting


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TubeNet BBS ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Chuck(G) on May 10, 2002 at 19:23:12:

In Reply to: Re: Re: Euphonium cutting posted by Klaus on May 10, 2002 at 18:32:05:

Regardless, we're both dealing with supposition here. Me, for thinking that the beast might actually exist in some form because it's mentioned in a catalog and Klaus for extrapolating that it would be a 3-valve horn.

Even it were 3-valve, you'd still have a firm basis (i.e. correctly-tapered branches) for a 4-valve euphonium, so it still might be worth investigating.

My suspicion is that the catalog entry exists, but little else.


Follow Ups: