Re: Re: Re: BAMs without BATs


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TubeNet BBS ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by John on November 26, 2002 at 11:20:47:

In Reply to: Re: Re: BAMs without BATs posted by js on November 25, 2002 at 21:51:53:

I think that one needs to use caution when mentioning this "Theory". There has been extensive resaerch done on Focal Dystonia in recent years, and the equiptment issue has not been found to be the cause of this problem. If you'd like to learn more on this topic, and perhaps quell some assumptions, contact Paul Krzywicki.He has somewhat extensive knowledge on this subject. Perhaps it's best if we don't assume things, but become educated. Only at this point, can solid "theories" be made.


Follow Ups: