Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Yet another change to The Tuba Sound


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TubeNet BBS ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Carl on July 17, 2001 at 02:21:40:

In Reply to: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Yet another change to The Tuba Sound posted by Rick Denney on July 16, 2001 at 14:39:12:

Rick sez:

>don't go all passive-aggressive on me.

Uh... as long as you don't get all agggressive-aggressive.

>There is no reason for you to remain curious
>about my assertions--just ask and I'll be happy
>to explain them.

That was a polite way of wondering aloud how you can make absolute comparative statements favoring "trial & error" instrument design over computer-assisted acoustical modeling, when the latter has NEVER been tried. My curiosity was more about your ability to draw conclusions based on NO facts or applicable experience.

Obviously these new tools must be used in conjunction with human ears and common sense.

To quote Joe S., "words have meanings".

Glad you fellows weren't around to influence the Wright brothers!



Follow Ups: