Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: '20s Conn CC tubas?


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TubeNet BBS ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by whatever on January 18, 2004 at 17:27:05:

In Reply to: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: '20s Conn CC tubas? posted by Okay on January 18, 2004 at 13:44:04:

Needling aside, if you chose to present "reasonable likelihood" (my term) as meaning "impossible" (your characterization), you're just being argumentative, and somewhat unfairly. Which of those two terms sounds more like a "rant"? Your citation was copyrighted when? And your copies the first edition? Wasn't Anderson still being published (and edited/revised/re-released) post-ww2? At least you (apparently) took it down from the dusty shelf prior to typing this time. Wish you'd taken that time to respond to my thoughts, rather than react to them. Certainly no subtle difference between this thread, and legitimate discussion, or even spirited debate, at least no thanks to me.

Another post-er stated the following: "Just because it isn't likely doesn't mean it isn't so" leave it at that.




Follow Ups: