Re: Re: Re: Re: 56j design flaws


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TubeNet BBS ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by mark again on January 24, 2003 at 23:08:57:

In Reply to: Re: Re: Re: 56j design flaws posted by Mark on January 24, 2003 at 23:02:18:

Oops, my bad - I meant to offer the .718" bore suggestion to Sam, not Chuck. - Though I'm sure Chuck could try it too.

Mark "Hey, they both have the last name 'G' " Mazak


Follow Ups: